It is with much penitence that I creep back to my computer. I’m now a few books behind on my resolution to write about what I’ve read and how it’s affecting my style. I have to skip The Art of Time in Fiction by Joan Silber for the nonce, because I don’t have it with me.
Most recently, I finished reading Ghost Story by Peter Straub. The first thing that impressed me about this story was that, in the prologue, he allowed his characters’ names to reveal themselves organically i.e. he didn’t give them narrative introductions. This immediately sucked me into the story and I found myself blazing through pages just to find out about whom I was reading. This wasn’t the only thing that involved me in the story from the get-go. The first two sentences of the story are:
“What was the worst thing you’ve ever done?
I won’t tell you that, but I’ll tell you the worst thing that ever happened to me… the most dreadful thing…”
This question, and its response, occurs several times throughout the story, and its placement as the opening lines sets the tone of the story: it’s going to be about bad things, the most dreadful things imaginable. These lines invite the reader to listen, to join in the revelations of the characters. Underneath that, there’s the implication that there’s more to the story than what is revealed. It paints the characters as victims of tragedy, but also hints that they may have had a role in their destruction.
From there, the story becomes a rather typical horror story. Through discussion and interaction, the characters realize that the whole of their lives have been colored by their repeated encounters with the mysterious supernatural beast known as a Manitou, a shapeshifter supposedly at the heart of all other monster stories, including vampires and werewolves.
I’ll save my thoughts about The Dramatic Moment for another time. Suffice it to say, Straub uses the conventional expositional device of characters sharing their backstories with each other as an organic necessity of the story. It’s basically all of what The Chowder Society does. Add to this the Manitou, a creature so vain that it reveals its true nature to its victims. If the prologue sucks the reader in by presenting an exposition-free situation, the body of the story satisfies the reader’s curiosity, and then some.
As an English major, I find myself reading a lot of stuff that, as good as it is, I am completely okay with putting down when I’m done with a chapter. For example, I actually stopped reading Absolam, Absolam! by William Faulkner to read Ghost Story. (This is actually a very rare occurrence for me, and always disappointing.) A couple weeks ago, I found myself, at one fifteen in the morning, justifying to myself, “I’ll just read one more chapter, then go to bed.” It was surprising and pleasing to find that the joy wasn’t dead; it was alive and well, lurking as many insatiable creatures do, starving, but patient, waiting to pounce and sink its teeth into a nice, juicy story.
It is this same joy, and love, that motivates me in writing. I get excited about my stories and characters. Recently, The Dead Oak has been dragging for me, mostly because, since I’m doing it for school, it’s an assignment, which seems to have sucked the joy right out of it. Ghost Story was a reminder of what a story could be, should be to its author and audience.
Thank you, Mr. Straub, for reopening my eyes to joy.

